On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:59:52AM -0400, George Robbins wrote:
> If I recall, there's an issue with the keep-alives not being ecapsulated
> with the dot1q stuff, they get treated as if they were and crc errors
> result. Or course, that's just regurgitate list hearsay. 8-)
Aren't frames which don't have VLAN header treated as "belonging to the
native VLAN" by default? Or am I still asleep?
> > Subject: [nsp] CRC errors on trunks
> > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
> >
> > Sorry, but I whacked the original thread, so I'll just jump in:
> >
> > Why would turning off the keepalives on a trunk interface to a router be a
> > fix? Why was the switch seeing the keealives from the router as CRC
> > frames? Any insight? I have a client with a 802.1q trunk that is doing
> > the same thing with a 3524XL and a 2620.
SY,
-- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666 http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:49 EDT