Re: [nsp] designs for site-to-site failover?

• Next message: Gert Doering: "[nsp] In-Depth experience with Netflow Prefix Aggregation?"
• Previous message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] 5 minute output rate 84000 bits/sec, 81 packets/sec"
• In reply to: Steve Francis: "[nsp] designs for site-to-site failover?"
• Next in thread: Steve Francis: "[nsp] designs for site-to-site failover?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 07:52:57AM -0700, Steve Francis wrote:
> Basically I want to know what other people are doing for site-to-site
> data center failover.
>
> We have an ASP type service, and data centers in New York and San Francisco.
>
> Currently the NYC data center doesn't provide all the services of SF.
> All our public IP addresses are within a /24 at SF.

The only really scalable Cisco way of doing this is with a Distributed
Director or, even better, a CSS11000. This will allow you to do both failover
and load balancing between the data centers.

-- 
         Ryan O'Connell - CCIE #8174
<ryan@complicity.co.uk> - http://www.complicity.co.uk
I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines,
I'm just learning new things with the passage of time

• Next message: Gert Doering: "[nsp] In-Depth experience with Netflow Prefix Aggregation?"
• Previous message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] 5 minute output rate 84000 bits/sec, 81 packets/sec"
• In reply to: Steve Francis: "[nsp] designs for site-to-site failover?"
• Next in thread: Steve Francis: "[nsp] designs for site-to-site failover?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:51 EDT