Re: [nsp] two interfaces on the same LAN with same subnet

From: Niels Bakker (niels=cisco-nsp@bakker.net)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2001 - 12:13:55 EST

Next message: Steven Godfrey: "[nsp] 2900XL VLAN1 cannot resolve arps?"
Previous message: TARRY James: "PPP TACACS+ question"
In reply to: Neil J. McRae: "[nsp] two interfaces on the same LAN with same subnet"
Next in thread: Andy Harding: "RE: [nsp] two interfaces on the same LAN with same subnet"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

* neil@COLT.NET (Neil J. McRae) [Wed 14 Nov 2001, 18:08 CET]:
> We need to have two interfaces on the same subnet into the same
> switch but we can't use ISL/VLAN/.Q etc. So we effectively double
> the bandwidth to that LAN.

FastEtherChannel?

!
interface Port-Channel1
ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
full-duplex
port-group 1
!

I'm not sure about the switch side of things, IOS for 2900/3500 has
similar syntax on the physical interfaces, CatOS has `set port trunk'...

-- Niels.

Next message: Steven Godfrey: "[nsp] 2900XL VLAN1 cannot resolve arps?"
Previous message: TARRY James: "PPP TACACS+ question"
In reply to: Neil J. McRae: "[nsp] two interfaces on the same LAN with same subnet"
Next in thread: Andy Harding: "RE: [nsp] two interfaces on the same LAN with same subnet"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:54 EDT