[nsp] Microcom vs. MICA

From: kevin graham (kgraham@mediaplex.com)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 12:56:10 EST

Next message: Eduardo Pannunzio: "[nsp] A newbie question about MPLS"
Previous message: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] traceroute and icmp"
Next in thread: kevin graham: "[nsp] Microcom vs. MICA"
Maybe reply: kevin graham: "[nsp] Microcom vs. MICA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Does anyone know if there's any advantages to v.90 MICA's vs. v.90
Microcom's in an AS5200? I haven't been able to find anything on cco other
than that the Microcom's are older (provided they're v.90 mcoms vs the
older v.34's).

Is there something I'm overlooking or that only the more cluefully endowed
are made aware of?

thanks.
..kg..

Next message: Eduardo Pannunzio: "[nsp] A newbie question about MPLS"
Previous message: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] traceroute and icmp"
Next in thread: kevin graham: "[nsp] Microcom vs. MICA"
Maybe reply: kevin graham: "[nsp] Microcom vs. MICA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:56 EDT