Re: Source routing

From: Lars Fenneberg (lf@elemental.net)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 16:48:41 EST

Next message: horape@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar: "Re: [nsp] IOS for AS5300"
Previous message: Anne Marcel Roorda: "Re: [nsp] basement multihoming"
In reply to: Robert J. Adams: "Source routing"
Next in thread: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Reply: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Reply: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi Robert!

Quoting Robert J. Adams (radams@siscom.net):

> I'm currently using a routing policy to force anything from 209.251.30.20
> to next-hop "Sprint", and anything from 209.251.30.21 to next-hop "UUnet".
> Once we got up to about 60Meg/sec on a 300Mhz VXR I'm at around 80% CPU.
> Is there a better way of doing this? See below for our current config.

Your PBR is currently fast-switched. You could try switching to
Netflow based PBR:

        ip cef [distributed]
        ip flow-cache feature-accelerate
        interface XXXXXX
         ip route-cache flow
         ip policy route-map YYYYYY

Cheers,
Lars.

-- 
Lars Fenneberg, lf@elemental.net (private), lf@mcs-cityline.net (work)

Next message: horape@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar: "Re: [nsp] IOS for AS5300"
Previous message: Anne Marcel Roorda: "Re: [nsp] basement multihoming"
In reply to: Robert J. Adams: "Source routing"
Next in thread: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Reply: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Reply: Robert J. Adams: "Re: Source routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:00 EDT