THis thread originally started with just the premise of multiple VRF's
per associated sub-interfaces (or interfaces), w/o depending on MPLS.
It occurs to me that you could do this part of Multi-VRF just with
policy routing. (Although it would handle address overlap, etc, that VRF
does.)
Does anyone have any info on performance comparisons of
Netflow Feature accelerated policy routing, as compared to Multi-VRF?
Bruce R. Babcock wrote:
> The feature is officially called: Multi-VRF CE
> First supported in 12.2(4)T
> CCO has descriptions and cfg's posted.
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/1575_pp.htm
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/
> The Feature Navigator issue has been reported and is currently being
> addressed.
>
> -Bruce
>
> At 05:23 PM 2/6/2002, Jan Gunnik Hope wrote:
>
>> We use c3640-jk8s-mz.122-1.bin
>>
>> Also remember to look out for CEF problems on
>> the .1Q interfaces, i.e.
>> no ip route-cache
>> on the FastEthernet's, as I mentioned in another thread.
>> Sometimes everything look fine doing the local pings,
>> and then some destinations gets shaky.
>>
>> If someone has a bugID on that problem, I sure would like
>> to know...
>>
>> jgh
>>
>> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
>> Fra: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@greenie.muc.de]
>> Sendt: 6. februar 2002 17:00
>> Til: Jan Gunnik Hope; Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Emne: Re: SV: [nsp] VRF routing / smaller boxes?
>>
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Jan Gunnik Hope wrote:
>> > We have MPLS VPN (vrf routing) and .1q routing in
>> > production on 3640 platform.
>> > In Feature Navigator, you want to look for :
>> > MPLS Virtual Private Networks (VPN)
>>
>> Which IOS version do you use?
>>
>> gert
>> --
>> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>>
>> //www.muc.de/~gert/
>> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
>> gert@greenie.muc.de
>> fax: +49-89-35655025
>> gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> This verifies that this e-mail has been scanned for virus and deemed
>> virus-free
>> according to F-secure Content Scanner 5.0
>> Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:59:52 +0100 GMT
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:03 EDT