Another issue we just discovered with VIP processors is that dCEF wil not
work with named access control lists, at least with 12.1 ios. change to
numbered ACLs if you want to take advantage of the VIP, and be sure to
monitor the VIP CPU utilization which will probably be higher than the
RSP.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Tito B. wrote:
> At 10:57 AM 2/7/02 +0200, Ignas Bagdonas wrote:,
>
> >Yes, VIP4 indeed has no support for PA-2FEISL-TX, I have stepped on this
> >in a bad way half a year ago.
>
> looks like I can't remove the VIP2-50 (with PA-2FEISL-TX) until I get a new
> PA-2FE-TX for the VIP4-80. The VIP4 must learn to live with the VIP2 for a
> while longer, can't they?
>
> one more thing, found this document saying I can't use my PA-2FE-TX on my
> VIP2-50 without first
> upgrading its hardware version:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn13098.shtml
>
> IDS-7507-1LTP3#sh diag
>
> Slot 1:
> Physical slot 1, ~physical slot 0xE, logical slot 1, CBus 0
> Microcode Status 0x4
> Master Enable, LED, WCS Loaded
> Board is analyzed
> Pending I/O Status: None
> EEPROM format version 1
> VIP2 R5K controller, HW rev 2.02, board revision A0
> Serial number: 12314241 Part number: 73-2167-04
> Test history: 0x0E RMA number: 00-11-82
> Flags: cisco 7000 board; 7500 compatible
>
> thanks!
>
> ./tito
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Art Houle e-mail: houle@acns.fsu.edu.
Academic Computing & Network Services Voice: 850-644-2591
Florida State University FAX: 850-644-8722
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:04 EDT