Re: [nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid

From: Martin Cooper (mjc@cooper.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 14:57:48 EST

Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: [nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Previous message: Cheung, Rick: "[nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Maybe in reply to: Cheung, Rick: "[nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Next in thread: Martin Cooper: "Re: [nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rick Cheung <Rick.Cheung@NextelPartners.com> writes:

> Is there any reason not to migrate to native mode IOS?

- After boot, the MSFC IOS takes over control of the supervisor,
so if it crashes, you have no access to the switch management.
- Recovering from deleted/corrupt switch IOS is harder in native.
- The hybrid mode switch CLI is more quick for switch management.
- Lots of switch features aren't supported under the native mode.

Martin

Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: [nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Previous message: Cheung, Rick: "[nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Maybe in reply to: Cheung, Rick: "[nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Next in thread: Martin Cooper: "Re: [nsp] 6500 + MSFC: Native mode vs Hybrid"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:05 EDT