Re: newbie question!

From: Ryan O'Connell (ryan-nsp@complicity.co.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 11 2002 - 14:42:31 EDT

Next message: matthew zeier: "[nsp] used cisco vendors"
Previous message: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
In reply to: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Next in thread: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Reply: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Reply: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 11-Apr-2002 Rick Burts wrote:
> Actually what you say is true for LAN interfaces but not for serial
> interfaces. The IOS will allow serial interfaces to be configured
> within the same subnet as the following example shows:
>
> Router_D#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> R1(config)#int serial1/0
> R1(config-if)#ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.240
> R1(config-if)#int serial1/1
> R1(config-if)#ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.240
> R1(config-if)#

That surprises me. Does it work if you "no shut" both interfaces? I suspect it
won't. If it does, not sure if it's intentional or a bug, 'cos I can't see how
the routing is supposed to work on that. Any idea why it's permitted?

-- 
Ryan O'Connell - CCIE #8147
<ryan@complicity.co.uk>
http://www.complicity.co.uk

Next message: matthew zeier: "[nsp] used cisco vendors"
Previous message: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
In reply to: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Next in thread: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Reply: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Reply: Rick Burts: "Re: newbie question!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:11 EDT