Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast

• Next message: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Previous message: George Sheng: "Re: [nsp] Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup"
• In reply to: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Next in thread: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Reply: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Reply: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 06:04:02PM -0600, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
> On 12.0.21-S1 (fixed the 19-S1 bug), we ran into a bug last
> week where a the wrong mixture of "ip mroute cache
> distributed", MTU over 1500 and ACLs sends conflicting flags
> to the line cards (GigE and POS) and causes every multicast
> route to be pruned. I don't think a bug ID has been created
> for this one yet.

Ah. I read this as "you're using GSRs". We're using only 7200/7500s,
so this wouldn't be an issue for us.

thanks.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

• Next message: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Previous message: George Sheng: "Re: [nsp] Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup"
• In reply to: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Next in thread: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Reply: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Reply: Pete Kruckenberg: "Re: [nsp] IOS train for multicast"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:11 EDT