Re: [nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?

From: Ryan O'Connell (ryan-nsp@complicity.co.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 19 2002 - 17:27:39 EDT

Next message: Arturo Lev Servin Niembro: "Re: [nsp] LS100 Password Recovery"
Previous message: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
In reply to: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
Next in thread: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:22:07PM -0500, Zhang, Anchi wrote:
> ap0500006s running on our multiple CSS 11000s has not been stable and ap0500006s is recommended to us. Would anybody have any experience with ap0500006s?

IME, no version is stable - they all have different bugs. You're probably best
doing your own testing using just the features you use or going with the
latest release if resources don't permit that.

-- Ryan O'Connell - CCIE #8174 <ryan@complicity.co.uk> - http://www.complicity.co.uk

I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines, I'm just learning new things with the passage of time

Next message: Arturo Lev Servin Niembro: "Re: [nsp] LS100 Password Recovery"
Previous message: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
In reply to: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
Next in thread: Zhang, Anchi: "[nsp] ap0500042s stable for css 11000?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:12 EDT