RE: [nsp] traffic shaping help

From: Douglas M. Todd, Jr. (dtodd@partners.org)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 12:25:52 EDT

Next message: Douglas M. Todd, Jr.: "RE: [nsp] routed interface on 6509"
Previous message: Andre D. Henry: "Re: PPTP woes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You can use CAR if necessary . I would recommend you
use the rate-limit command and provide traffic shapping on your RAS
circuits.

If you would like some more information email me directly and I could help
you with it.

Thanks.

==DMT>

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@inch.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:00 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] traffic shaping help

Hi,

I'm looking for a quick handout, and I won't be bashful about asking :)

Due to events in NYC, I've lost backhaul to a dial pop. I'm working on
getting 8 POTS lines trunked together between two USR/3com RAS boxes.
This is pretty pitiful bandwidth...

Given that I know the address ranges, and that there's a Cisco upstream of
the RAS box, is there anything that can rate shape on a per-ip basis?
Meaning each single IP rate-shaped/limited/whatever to say 14,400
bits/sec?

Or any other suggestions? POTS is really the only link I can get between
locations.

Thanks,

Charles

Next message: Douglas M. Todd, Jr.: "RE: [nsp] routed interface on 6509"
Previous message: Andre D. Henry: "Re: PPTP woes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:19 EDT