Well, after re-reading the message I replied to, I would say my comment
was alittle off. What was discussed/wished upon was the ability to do as
little hands on configuration as possible.. This was kind of a similar
problem that I am working on, in which I am handling the possible changing
of packet filtering rules, or even the possibility of routing tables on
the fly when certain actions occur. These actions can be defined as
security related, etc etc..
You are correct to think this is a bit off topic.. I kind of was
misthinking when you mentioned "as little hands on as possible" due to my
current projects at hand ;)
Sorry for the off topic message.
Andrew
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Shane Kerr wrote:
> >
> > Is this along the lines of a action-reaction matrix? Beware of the
> > consequences of your wishes!!!
>
> What's an 'action-reaction matrix'? A WWW search turned up stuff on
> military strategy, artificial intelligence, economics, and so on, but
> nothing related to routing, as far as I can tell.
>
> Yours in ignorance,
> Shane
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT