Frank,
> At 08:20 AM 12/12/01 +0100, Sean Doran wrote:
> >| >> this split is "institutionalized"? I am sure the authors and
> >| >> editors will be happy to think of definitive ways to exclude
> >| >> architectures which ELIMINATE the concept of intra-domain/inter-domain
> >| >> protocol splits.
> >|
> >| The editor heartily concurs (assuming that the rest of the RRG
> >| concurs with the idea!)
> >
> >Well, except that I missed a "not" in between "ways" and "to" in the
> >2nd line above, which you fortunately seem to have obligingly
> >hallucinated into the sentence, figuring that must have been what
> >I meant (I hope). :-)
>
> no. i did not hallucinate anything. i personally think, and it is
> my impression that the requirements sub-group was in agreement,
> that such an artifical and forced split is A Bad Idea.
I certainly don't recall such an agreement. In fact, I disagree with
the statement that inter-intra domain split is "A Bad Idea".
Yakov.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT