Re: requirements sub-group draft

From: Kastenholz, Frank (FKastenholz@unispherenetworks.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:00:23 EST


At 10:47 AM 12/12/01 -0500, Andrew Partan wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:18:54AM -0800, demir wrote:
>> I don't think inter-domain and intra-domain routing are fundamentally
>> different. However, when "management and operation" of domains are handled
>> by different "administration," then "design", "control factors,"
>> requirements, protocols, etc diverges (becomes different). Let's
>> assume, one intra-domain is composed of more than one "Differentiated
>> Services domain.". As a result, routing of intra-domain migt look
>> like "inter-domain" depending on the design and architecture. To me,
>> routing itself is a fundamental concept in networking. "Domain"/"Hierarch"
>> creates "internal" and "external" "information."
>
>Those are human/adminsitrative labels. The protocols should not
>be fundamentally different and force such a split.

yes. thank you

f



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT