Re: requirements sub-group draft

From: Andrew Partan (asp@partan.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:22:38 EST

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:16:19AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I want to be able to compose things at N layers
>
> mild objection to 'layers'. it seems to 'fix' boundaries, which harms
> the idea that the abstraction structure is different depending on one's
> topological view-point.

Sorry re terminology. Noel is always more correct here.
By 'layers' here I more mean how I want to administratively
topologically group my routers.
        --asp

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT