Re: requirements sub-group draft

From: Jeffrey Haas (jhaas@nexthop.com)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 15:40:09 EST


On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 05:49:07PM -0500, Kastenholz, Frank wrote:
> Section 3.27 explictly says we preserve the current HbH model,
> but others _may_ be added.

A random thought:
If we're considering non-hop-by-hop solutions, might not one also
be able to elicit paths from the routing system where none existed
before?

How might this affect our requirements?

-- 
Jeff Haas 
NextHop Technologies



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT