was typo. this url works:
http://partner.unispherenetworks.com/rrg/
Regarding Group B, I'd like to draw attention to section 10.9:
Is it possible to apply a control theory framework, and analyze the
stability of the control system of the whole network domain, for e.g.
convergence speed and the frequency response, and then use the
results from that analysis to set the timers and other protocol
parameters.
Control theory could also play a part is QoS Routing, by modifying
current link state protocols with link costs dependent on load.
Control theory is used to increase the stability of such systems.
At best, it might be possible to construct a new totally dynamical
routing protocol solely on a control theoretic basis as opposed to
the current protocols which are based in graph theory and static in
nature.
Solution is ASM model:
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/gasm
-- Cheers, TT
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Poke Poke...
Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:54:37 -0500
Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net
Resent-To: irtf-rr@puck.nether.net
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:47:00 -0500
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com>
To: "Kastenholz, Frank"
<FKastenholz@unispherenetworks.com>,irtf-rr@puck.nether.net
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020304084834.02bc9bc0@uniwest1>
At 8:49 AM -0500 3/4/02, Kastenholz, Frank wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>A while ago I sent out a note
>saying that the requirements sub-group
>has produced a not-quite-an-internet-draft
>document. We've received little in the way
>of commentary. Does that mean we should get
>it published as an RFC?
Assuming this is the next-generation routing requirments, did you see
a round of seeing if it could be harmonized with the Group B work?
More broadly, what's the next step for both of these? We have sent
in our document as an I-D, which I assumed you would.
>
>I'd like to close this out and move on to bigger
>and better things :-)
>The document is available at http://partners.unispherenetworks.com/rrg
>and it's version 4 (the last one on the index page) that we'd
>like reviewed.
I'm getting a "server not found" message when I try to retrieve it.
>
>Frank Kastenholz
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT