Frank,
I'm working on technical comments, should be able to
send them out within a week or so.
Aside from that, it appeared to me that there was sufficient
amount of editorial work that had to be done before I would
think about initiating a last call type of action for
this document.
Also, did you guys discuss the possibility of merging work
with the other group? I'd rather see this happening here
and now than confuse the consumers with two independent
documents and have them make the judgement calls. Besides,
the merger work should generate a set of quite interesting
discussions that I'm sure everyone would benefit from...
-- Alex ZininMonday, March 04, 2002, 5:49:31 AM, Kastenholz, Frank wrote:
> Hi folks,
> A while ago I sent out a note > saying that the requirements sub-group > has produced a not-quite-an-internet-draft > document. We've received little in the way > of commentary. Does that mean we should get > it published as an RFC?
> I'd like to close this out and move on to bigger > and better things :-) > The document is available at http://partners.unispherenetworks.com/rrg > and it's version 4 (the last one on the index page) that we'd > like reviewed.
> Frank Kastenholz
> ======================================= > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information, including without > limitation, Confidential and/or Proprietary Information belonging to > Unisphere Networks, Inc. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original > message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT