> 1. If we were to produce a single document then
> it would be very close to being a "standard"
> (even though the name would not include those
> 8 letters). This means that our whole process
> would open up to the IETF's way of doing things.
This really isn't the case. It's fine if the RG produces a single
requirements document - though not required - and I agree with other
posters that this would be quite desirable if doable.
Vern
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT