At 05:58 PM 1/8/01 -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>If this is the case, an occasional note to the MPLS WG describing the
>status of the documents (or any WG which had a document held up) would
>greatly improve the image of the IESG.
when the IESG is out of the loop? I can see the RFC Editor (who held the
documents up) doing that, or the chairs (whom both the ADs and I have been
pushing to get the issues closed) doing that. When I send a note to George
and Vijay saying "I read this at the RFC Editor's web site; what's the plan
for resolving it?", I would see copying the working group as somewhat
incendiary. Perhaps they have had the same opinion when they beat up the
guys holding the pen.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT