Re: [j-nsp] Direct and Local Routes

• Next message: Sher, Ryan: "[j-nsp] constraining bootstap messages at domain boundaries"
• Previous message: vpbs bak: "[j-nsp] Does Juniper support CR-LDP ?"
• Maybe in reply to: JunoGuy: "[j-nsp] Direct and Local Routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

My guess is that since lo0 can only be /32, the direct subnet and local of lo0
are always the same, it could go either way. They only inconvenience if Junos
made it local could be redistribution, we do not normally just redistribute
local interfaces, so if we make lo0 local, then we will have to remember to
redistribute local and add policy to filter other /32s out.

My .02

Thanks
Kent

----- Original Message -----
From: JunoGuy
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net ; juniper@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:17 PM
Subject: [j-nsp] Direct and Local Routes

I realize that both direct and local routes have the same route preference but
can anyone explain to me why Junos reports a Lo0 interface address as a DIRECT
route and other /32 addresses on a non-loopback interface as LOCAL routes?

JunoGuy

• Next message: Sher, Ryan: "[j-nsp] constraining bootstap messages at domain boundaries"
• Previous message: vpbs bak: "[j-nsp] Does Juniper support CR-LDP ?"
• Maybe in reply to: JunoGuy: "[j-nsp] Direct and Local Routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT