Re: [j-nsp] [j-nsp] default route via BGP

From: Kent Yu (kyu@opnet.com)
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 14:32:45 EDT


Joe,

I think only flow control actions can cause the policy to stop or skip, the
next-hop should not interrupt the flow.

Thanks
Kent

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Soricelli" <joe@soricelli.com>
To: <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:39 PM
Subject: [j-nsp] [j-nsp] default route via BGP

> Chris,
>
> When you defined the action of "next-hop self" within the route-filter,
> that action was taken and ALL actions in the "then" portion of the
> term were ignored. Since the route-filter actions did not have an
> accept/reject within them, the route evaluation moved to the second
> term. The second term matched all routes (including your 0/0) and
> rejected them. That's why it isn't being sent. Change your policy
> to something like this..
>
> term send-default {
> from route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact;
> then {
> next-hop self;
> accept;
> }
> }
> term reject {
> then reject;
> }
>
> HTH,
> Joe
>
> ____________Original Message________________
> Hi,
>
> I need to send 0/0 to a customer via BGP ...
>
> term send-default {
> from {
> route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact {
> next-hop self;
> }
> }
> then accept;
> }
> term reject {
> then reject;
> }
>
>
> I just tried that simple statement but it doesn't advertise 0/0 at all
>
> got any idea ?
>
> thanks
>
> -chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT