Re: [j-nsp] relationship between interface shaping and policers

From: Hank Nussbacher (hank@att.net.il)
Date: Sat May 04 2002 - 14:23:09 EDT


At 01:10 PM 03-05-02 -0400, Przemyslaw Karwasiecki wrote:

As we recently found out, "You must configure all the ports on an ATM E3 or
T3 PIC with the same framing and encapsulation. Otherwise, the system will
set all the ports on the PIC to the slowest framing and encapsulating
configuration." This affects traffic shaping.

-Hank

>Hello,
>
>What is the relationship between shaping applied to
>ATM subinterfaces (units) and traffic policing and queuing?
>
>Can I expect, that traffic which is "shaped" as ATM CBR
>will cause queue drops in case violating of CBR parameters?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Przemek



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT