[j-nsp] Any guides on doing a mltuicast tunnel without a tunnel PIC?

• Next message: Walter De Smedt: "Juniper's interface mib"
• Previous message: Anthony Pardini: "number of routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

HW: Stock M5 with (2) 4-Port T1 cards. (6 ports in use.
Userbase: ~1000 cable modem users at 256Kb.

I want to get a multicast tunnel from Sprint but I wanted to get
opinions and pointers to doc's on doing multicast on the Juniper without
a Tunnel PIC. I understand the reason for the PIC but with such a low
users base and a tight A** local cable co. owner I cant see the need for
spending any money on a PIC for a single tunnel. I mean I had a tunnel
on a 2501 10 years ago so I cant imagine needing a PIC on a modern M5 to
make a friggin tunnel. I just want to broadcast a MC feed to the cable
users. I only need one tunnel. Will this work without a PIC? I read in
the archive someone has done it but I wanted to get second opinions.
There about to get a chanellized DS3 from UUnet. So if its possible then
im off to decide who has the better MC backbone Sprint or UUnet.

Thanks for any info!!

Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE85WvWeQnj3DRFpmoRAu2eAKCDDVRhAEQSnNpQjHHrszuxZdLK1wCeJuGe
hBKFK5n5lnUblWbYEQXjru4=
=UDBO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: Walter De Smedt: "Juniper's interface mib"
• Previous message: Anthony Pardini: "number of routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT