Only if the host's routing is really dumb. He couldn't hit a second host
on the directly-connected lan.
GK
At 08:07 AM 9/5/2001, Metz, Eduard wrote:
>seems like default gateway missing on the hosts ...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Ketell [mailto:gketell@juniper.net]
> > Sent: 05 September 2001 16:59
> > To: Jan Stanicek; 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > Subject: Re: Minimal configuration for routing between two ports
> >
> >
> > At 07:38 AM 9/5/2001, Jan Stanicek wrote:
> > >Hello all,
> > >
> > > I am very sorry for this trivial questions.
> > >
> > > I need to set up routing betwen two ports:
> > >
> > > fe-1/1/0 {
> > > unit 0 {
> > > family inet {
> > > address 192.168.1.143/24;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > > fe-1/1/1 {
> > > unit 0 {
> > > family inet {
> > > address 192.168.111.1/24;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > >I have worstations with addresses 192.168.1.7 and
> > 192.168.111.141 connected
> > >to apropriate port.
> > >
> > >I am able (for example) to ping from workstatin 192.168.1.7 to port
> > >192.168.111.1, but
> >
> >
> > >it is not possible to ping from workstation 192.168.1.7
> > >to second workstation 192.168.1.141.
> >
> > That has nothing to do with the router. If the router
> > weren't even there
> > this should work since they are on the same LAN. I would check your
> > workstation configs.
> >
> > GK
> >
> >
> > >I have tried to configure static routes, RIP, but nothing helps me.
> > >
> > >Can anybody send me a list of things, which I should
> > configure for routing
> > >between these two ports?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much, and again ... sorry for this
> > trivial question.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jan Stanicek
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT