Gary,
your attachment made the message larger than 524k the limit
for a large post to the list.
I've archived it at
http://puck.nether.net/juniper-nsp/OverlappingVPNsJUNOS44.pdf
- jared
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 05:24:48AM -0400, Gary Tate wrote:
> Hi Majid,
>
> The section covering "Overlapping VPN's" will be added to the documentation
> on the WEB shortly. For you convenience I have attached the information
> here. It covers and example almost exactly as you have requested.
>
> If you have any further Question please feel free to ask. I hope this helps
>
> Gary Tate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AM Shaikh [mailto:junosuser@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 21 September 2001 22:35
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Extranet in MPLS VPNs
>
>
> Has anyone an idea if MPLS VPN will work if I am using only one box ... I hv
> only one box at my disposal .. and I am trying to simulate an extranet
> scenario .... I set communities and allowed the routes to be imported in
> different vrfs ...
>
> say there are 3 vpns A, B and C
>
> and say A needs access to both B and C .. but B and C should not talk to
> each other ... even via A
>
> i set up A to import comunity B and C routes. And set both B&C to import A
> routes.
>
> but the routes show up in the routing table.
>
> My doubt is as i hv a single router and its bgp doesn't hv a neighbour ...
> the mpls vpn is not giving routes to bgp and from bgp to other vrfs ...
>
> Pls advise
>
> rgds
> majid
>
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT