I've reported the typo to the book's writer.
Thanks,
..Aviva
In message <NDBBJJMIKLKFLCJAPOOEIECPFFAA.milo279@yahoo.com>you write:
> This is a typo in the docs....the config should actually look like this:
>
> protocols {
> isis {
> export filter-on-voice-policy;
> rib-group common;
> interface so-2/2/2.0;
> interface so-4/2/2.0 {
> passive;
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> as you have shown the config this would imply entering the following
> command:
> set protocol isis passive
> This is an invlaid command
>
>
> milo
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xw [mailto:xiaowu23@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:51 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] ISIS - "passive"
>
>
> I came across the following config when I was looking at an ISIS
> routing instance in 5.1 Online Manual.
>
> protocols {
> isis {
> rib-group common;
> export filter-on-voice-policy;
> interface so-2/2/2.0;
> interface so-4/2/2.0;
> passive;
> }
> }
>
> My question is, why would we want to put "passive" here? If
> "interface so-2/2/2.0 passive" I understand what we are supposed
> to get but with the above configuration, are we telling the
> router to set both interface as passive or for other purposes???
>
> Any help will be very much appreciated.
>
> XW
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT