also , do show route receive-protocol bgp <bgp peer ip address> <prefix in
question> to see if you are indeed received the prefix on the juniper
router.
-dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Davies [mailto:Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:16 PM
To: 'Borchers, Mark'; 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: Private ASN's
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What's the prefix? By default, the Junipers won't discard prefixes
just because they're using private ASNs. However, there is a list of
martian prefixes which automatically get discarded. Try "show route
martians" to get a list.
Regards,
Guy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borchers, Mark [mailto:mborchers@splitrock.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:12 PM
> To: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Private ASN's
>
>
> We have an IBGP mesh consisting of a mixture of Ciscos and
> Junipers. A prefix from a downstream to whom we assigned a
> private ASN is being accepted by the Cisco routers but appears
> to be getting discarded by the Junipers. Can anybody confirm
> if this is the default *IBGP* behavior for prefixes containing
> private ASNs in the path? I'm not finding anything helpful
> on www.juniper.net.
>
> --
> Mark Borchers McLeodUSA Data Services
> IP Engineering 9012 New Trails Dr.
> mborchers@splitrock.net The Woodlands, TX 77381
> (281) 465-1931 http://www.mcleod.net/
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1
iQA/AwUBPD8dzY3dwu/Ss2PCEQKJbACgz3awCwg57Tu56nah/ue5Ut0XcWcAoLRj
UhLZr5E8dmyGIGHRYk/sa6D/
=51TS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT