jesper@testnxj4> show route martians
inet.0:
0.0.0.0/0 exact -- allowed
0.0.0.0/8 orlonger -- disallowed
127.0.0.0/8 orlonger -- disallowed
128.0.0.0/16 orlonger -- disallowed
191.255.0.0/16 orlonger -- disallowed
192.0.0.0/24 orlonger -- disallowed
223.255.255.0/24 orlonger -- disallowed
240.0.0.0/4 orlonger -- disallowed
192.168.0.0/16 orlonger -- disallowed
10.0.0.0/8 orlonger -- disallowed
172.16.0.0/12 orlonger -- disallowed
Those are the default martians, and any routing information for
these prefix'es will be dropped.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:31:51AM -0600, Borchers, Mark wrote:
> Done that and more. I can verify the advertisement on
> the Cisco sending the route (sh ip bgp nei <M160> adv).
> But I don't see it on the M160, even after removing all
> policy from my IBGP group and clearing the session.
>
> Can you tell me: does sh route received-prot bgp output
> all of the neighbor's advertisements, or only those which
> were put in the table after policy was applied?
>
> TIA,
> Mark
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Qi [mailto:dqi@bloomberg.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:26 AM
> > To: Guy Davies; Borchers, Mark; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: Private ASN's
> >
> >
> > also , do show route receive-protocol bgp <bgp peer ip
> > address> <prefix in
> > question> to see if you are indeed received the prefix on the juniper
> > router.
> >
> > -dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guy Davies [mailto:Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:16 PM
> > To: 'Borchers, Mark'; 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > Subject: RE: Private ASN's
> >
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > What's the prefix? By default, the Junipers won't discard prefixes
> > just because they're using private ASNs. However, there is a list of
> > martian prefixes which automatically get discarded. Try "show route
> > martians" to get a list.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Borchers, Mark [mailto:mborchers@splitrock.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:12 PM
> > > To: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > > Subject: Private ASN's
> > >
> > >
> > > We have an IBGP mesh consisting of a mixture of Ciscos and
> > > Junipers. A prefix from a downstream to whom we assigned a
> > > private ASN is being accepted by the Cisco routers but appears
> > > to be getting discarded by the Junipers. Can anybody confirm
> > > if this is the default *IBGP* behavior for prefixes containing
> > > private ASNs in the path? I'm not finding anything helpful
> > > on www.juniper.net.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Borchers McLeodUSA Data Services
> > > IP Engineering 9012 New Trails Dr.
> > > mborchers@splitrock.net The Woodlands, TX 77381
> > > (281) 465-1931 http://www.mcleod.net/
> > >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: PGP 7.0.1
> >
> > iQA/AwUBPD8dzY3dwu/Ss2PCEQKJbACgz3awCwg57Tu56nah/ue5Ut0XcWcAoLRj
> > UhLZr5E8dmyGIGHRYk/sa6D/
> > =51TS
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
>
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT