Thank you!
Is an idea of separating craft network from production interfaces
totally wrong?
Also, from totaly oposite side -- is it possible to forward packets
between production interfaces, and fxp0: ?
I was able to setup routes with nexthop pointing to fxp0: network,
but I have never seen any packet forwarded via fxp0:
I understand that second question implies totaly different approach
to fxp0: usage, but I just wanted to be sure that Imy observations
are correct.
Thanks again,
Przemek
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Ketell [mailto:gketell@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] default route just for fxp0
No.
GK
At 04:22 PM 6/27/2001 -0400, Przemyslaw Karwasiecki wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Is it possible to have default route just for craft
>fxp0: interface, which will be isolated from normal
>routing table?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Przemek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:39 EDT