-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sophia,
Other L2 VPN technologies should also do the trick (e.g. martini,
l2vpn and gre, as mentioned by Dave). Since CCC is not based on a
standard, it is likely to be available only on networks using Juniper
at the edge. CCC has recently had some interesting new capabilities
added which allow it to connect diverse encapsulations (e.g. ATM to
FR or PPP to FR but, unfortunately, not yet including Enet).
Martini and l2vpn are limited to similar encapsulations at both ends
of the VPN (the l2vpn draft does provide for interworking of
differing encapsulations so long as you only want to carry IP but
that doesn't meet your requirements).
Hope that helps.
Guy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dave o'leary [mailto:doleary@juniper.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:56 PM
> To: Sophia Lei; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] two VPN sites and CCC
>
>
> At 02:18 AM 2/13/2002 -0500, Sophia Lei wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> > >From documentation, it seems CCC supporting L2 frame
> >transport over MPLS. Can I transport IPX traffic
> >through my SP's MPLS+CCC network for my VPN sites?
> >I think it can as L2+IPX is just a L2 frame, right?
>
> Correct.
>
> >Any other way to do it if my SP don't do CCC?
>
> Switch service providers? :-)
>
> Something like GRE tunneling on the CPE routers could also be used.
>
> dave
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1
iQA/AwUBPGqYcY3dwu/Ss2PCEQLCjACgwCOzNTaZeuz6eg+/Ub+I3ZgnUXQAn3eI
Jpr06mHH2850Ev2MzG35yH/9
=mU6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:39 EDT