RE: [j-nsp] Classical IP interoperability

From: Ian Terry (ijt@evasam.com)
Date: Mon Apr 09 2001 - 11:17:09 EDT


The Cisco which needs connecting is operating ATM PVCs - therefore ATM
inverse ARP will be configured.
As far as I am concerned, a marrying up of PVCs, IP addresses and IARP
should be all that is required.

regards, Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Nazario [mailto:nazario@doit.wisc.edu]
Sent: 09 April 2001 15:43
To: Ian Terry; Jesper Skriver; Arnd Vehling
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Classical IP interoperability

Classical IP runs over ATM SVCs. I don't see how the Juniper could
participate in a classical IP connection without SVC support.

-Paul

At 03:18 PM 4/6/2001 +0100, Ian Terry wrote:
>Yes, sorry I should have confirmed this is over ATM
>
>regards, Ian
>
>email: ijt@evasam.com
>tel: 44 (0)7970 499187
>fax: 44 (0)1793 821091
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jesper@skriver.dk]
>Sent: 06 April 2001 15:02
>To: Arnd Vehling
>Cc: Ian Terry; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Classical IP interoperability
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 04:00:52PM +0200, Arnd Vehling wrote:
> > Ian Terry wrote:
> > > To resolve some legacy issues at one of our customers, in need to
>utilise
> > > Classical IP between Juniper and Cisco.
> > >
> > > Does anybody know of an issues?
> >
> > no. the only direkt link to a cisco via an OC3 is running fine.
> > We configured cisco-hldc on the link though.
>
>I think he's talking about classical IP over ATM ... but I don't have
>any experience to share ...
>
>/Jesper
>
>--
>Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
>Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
>Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
>
>One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
>One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:42 EDT