Doesn't that defeat the "discard" option?
In the below config packets will be dropped silently when they cannot be
forwarded, when the default route is not installed I think it will result in
ICMP packets being sent for unreachable destinations (similar to "reject").
But I'm not completely sure on this ...
cheers,
Eduard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Call [mailto:curtiscall@home.com]
> Sent: 17 May 2001 03:42
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] inserting default-route into ospf
>
>
> Add the no-install option to the static route if you don't
> want it in the
> forwarding table.
>
> At 05:37 PM 5/16/01, you wrote:
> >Marco,
> >
> >This should do it...There is no equivalent command.
> >
> >chris
> >
> >protocols {
> > ospf {
> > export default;
> > area 0.0.0.0 {
> > interface all;
> > }
> > }
> >}
> >policy-options {
> > policy-statement default {
> > from {
> > protocol static;
> > route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact;
> > }
> > ### Maybe set some properties here, like E1/E2,
> metric, tag, etc
> > then accept;
> > }
> >}
> >routing-options {
> > static {
> > route 0.0.0.0/0 discard;
> > }
> >}
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: MarcoH [mailto:marcoh@cistron.nl]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:44 PM
> > > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: [j-nsp] inserting default-route into ospf
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone of you know what the junos equivalent is of cisco`s
> > > "default-information originate always", so I can inject a
> > > default route
> > > into my OSPF-cloud, without actually installing a default
> > > route into the
> > > forwarding table.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > MarcoH
> > >
> > > --
> > > Confucious say:
> > > man who lay girl on hill, not on level.
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:42 EDT