One of our recent test involved MPLS interoperability between Cisco and
Juniper over ATM. Both Cisco and Juniper supported the "frame-mode"
MPLS which used aal5-snap.
Phong Ta
Frederick Fahrbach wrote:
>
> Cool. Per the Martini draft if I were to use AAL5
> frame transport instead of cell transport would I
> still be able to transport the UNI info across the
> MPLS cloud? I had heard that Cisco is unable to do
> this. I'm not an ATM person but what's the problem?
>
> Dick
> ==========
> --- Greg Ketell <gketell@juniper.net> wrote:
> > CCC will pass the UNI signalling through to the
> > other side. CCC will not
> > respond to UNI/NNI signalling.
> >
> > GK
> >
> > At 07:05 PM 5/16/2001 -0400, Andrea Reitzel wrote:
> >
> > >Maybe I misunderstand the question, but I think
> > the CCC ATM cell-relay
> > >feature in 4.4 would do what I think is being
> > asked. The cell-relay
> > >configuration allows the Juniper to pass ATM cells
> > through it without
> > >doing any decaps/encaps.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Andrea Reitzel
> > >Worldcom/vBNS Engineering
> > >areitzel@mci.net
> > >703-886-1809
> > >
> > >
> > >dave o'leary wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 03:53 PM 5/16/01 -0400, Dick Dale wrote:
> > > > >Is there support for ATM UNI, NNI signaling in
> > CCC? I
> > > > >understand that I can transport any and all
> > cells
> > > > >across the LSPs but didn't see anything within
> > the
> > > > >documentation that stated that I could support
> > SVCs.
> > > >
> > > > There is no UNI signalling support, and hence
> > SVCs are not
> > > > supported.
> > > >
> > > > dave
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:42 EDT