[alcatel-nsp] VRRP for VPRN on 7750
Rofik Alfajar
rofik.alfajar at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 05:40:06 EDT 2010
Yes, You are correct Pak.
Make sure interface "test" on both SR are in the same broadcast domain.
BR/Rofik.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Andhy Indarto <andhy.indarto at indosat.com>wrote:
> Dear Richard,
> Thank you for your information.
> So if I would like to have IP Address vprn interface SR-1 is 10.212.33.1
> and IP Address vprn interface SR-2 is 10.212.33.2 and IP Address of Virtual
> Interface VRRP is 10.212.33.3 than the config should be :
>
> 7750 SR-1:
> interface "test" create
> address 10.212.33.1/25
> vrrp 10
> backup 10.212.33.3
> ping-reply
> telnet-reply
> ssh-reply
> exit
>
> 7750 SR-2 :
> interface "test" create
> address 10.212.33.2/25
> vrrp 10
> backup 10.212.33.3
> priority 200
> ping-reply
> telnet-reply
> ssh-reply
> exit
>
> Does my config can fulfill the requirement if the Virtual IP VRRP of
> 10.212.33.3 ?
> Thank you
> Regards,
> andhi indarto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Lee [mailto:rl0001 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: Andhy Indarto
> Cc: alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [alcatel-nsp] VRRP for VPRN on 7750
>
> Also only one router should ever be master in each group. It's
> generally easier to configure the priorities differently so you know
> which one should be the primary.
>
> 7750 SR-1:
>
>
>
> interface "test" create
>
> address 10.212.33.1/25
>
> vrrp 10
>
> backup 10.212.33.3
>
> priority 200
>
> ping-reply
>
> telnet-reply
>
> ssh-reply
>
> exit
>
> vrrp 20
>
> ------------------ >backup 10.212.33.4
>
> ping-reply
>
> telnet-reply
>
> ssh-reply
>
> exit
>
>
>
>
>
> 7750 SR-2 :
>
>
>
> interface "test" create
>
> address 10.212.33.2/25
>
> vrrp 10
>
> backup 10.212.33.3
>
>
>
> ping-reply
>
> telnet-reply
>
> ssh-reply
>
> exit
>
> vrrp 20
>
> ----------------- >backup 10.212.33.4
> ----------------- >priority 200
>
> ping-reply
>
> telnet-reply
>
> ssh-reply
>
> exit
>
>
>
> On 21 April 2010 09:50, Richard Lee <rl0001 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andhy,
> >
> > I think you have specified the interface IP off SR-1 as the standby IP
> > for SR-2. The backup IP needs to be the same on both boxes
> >
> > Regards,
> > Richard Lee
> >
> > On 21 April 2010 09:15, Andhy Indarto <andhy.indarto at indosat.com> wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have config the vprn with vrrp feature. The config looks like this :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750 SR-1:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> interface "test" create
> >>
> >> address 10.212.33.1/25
> >>
> >> vrrp 10
> >>
> >> backup 10.212.33.3
> >>
> >> priority 200
> >>
> >> ping-reply
> >>
> >> telnet-reply
> >>
> >> ssh-reply
> >>
> >> exit
> >>
> >> vrrp 20
> >>
> >> backup 10.212.33.2
> >>
> >> ping-reply
> >>
> >> telnet-reply
> >>
> >> ssh-reply
> >>
> >> exit
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750 SR-2 :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> interface "test" create
> >>
> >> address 10.212.33.2/25
> >>
> >> vrrp 10
> >>
> >> backup 10.212.33.3
> >>
> >> priority 200
> >>
> >> ping-reply
> >>
> >> telnet-reply
> >>
> >> ssh-reply
> >>
> >> exit
> >>
> >> vrrp 20
> >>
> >> backup 10.212.33.1
> >>
> >> ping-reply
> >>
> >> telnet-reply
> >>
> >> ssh-reply
> >>
> >> exit
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> and the verification with show command are :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750 SR-1 :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750_SR1# show router 400 vrrp instance
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>
> >> VRRP Instances
> >>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>
> >> Interface Name VR Id Own Adm State Base Pri
> Msg
> >> Int Opr Pol Id InUse Pri Inh Int
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> test1 10 No Up Master
> >> 250 1 Up n/a 250 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.34.3
> >>
> >> test1 20 No Up Master
> >> 100 1 Up n/a 100 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.34.2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> test 10 No Up Backup
> >> 200 1 Up n/a 200 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.33.3
> >>
> >> test 20 No Up Backup
> >> 100 1 Up n/a 100 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.33.2
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750 SR-2 :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 7750_SR2# show router 500 vrrp instance
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>
> >> VRRP Instances
> >>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>
> >> Interface Name VR Id Own Adm State Base Pri
> Msg
> >> Int Opr Pol Id InUse Pri Inh Int
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> test1 10 No Up Master
> >> 200 1 Up n/a 200 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.34.3
> >>
> >> test1 20 No Up Master
> >> 100 1 Up n/a 100 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.34.2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> test 10 No Up Master
> >> 200 1 Up n/a 200 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.33.3
> >>
> >> test 20 No Up Master
> >> 100 1 Up n/a 100 No Backup Addr:
> >> 10.212.33.1
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The result is when the condition of vrrp is master and master than the
> >> traffic flow is normal such as in interface "test1" but when the
> condition
> >> of vrrp is master and backup than the traffic flow is fail.
> >>
> >> What is the good condition or the default condition of vrrp ? is it
> master
> >> and backup or master and master ?
> >>
> >> Is there any miss configuration that I make ?
> >>
> >> For service redundancy, especially vprn, does it better use vrrp or srrp
> ?
> >>
> >> Thank you for the support.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> andhi indarto
> >>
> >>
> >> *****
> >> "This message is intended only for recipients who are authorized to
> receive
> >> it.
> >> It contains confidential and/ or legally priveleged information belong
> to PT
> >> INDOSAT Tbk ("INDOSAT"), therefore the authorized recipients shall
> protect
> >> this confidential information disclosed pursuant to provisions of
> Indosat's
> >> policy.
> >> If you are not a valid recipient of this message, please delete it from
> your
> >> system and/ or destroy all of the tangible material produced from the
> >> information herein together with all copies or reproductions thereof and
> >> notify the sender immediately.
> >> Please also be notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> taking
> >> any action based on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited
> and
> >> may be unlawful".
> >> *****
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> alcatel-nsp mailing list
> >> alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> *****
> "This message is intended only for recipients who are authorized to receive
> it.
> It contains confidential and/ or legally priveleged information belong to
> PT INDOSAT Tbk ("INDOSAT"), therefore the authorized recipients shall
> protect this confidential information disclosed pursuant to provisions of
> Indosat's policy.
> If you are not a valid recipient of this message, please delete it from
> your system and/ or destroy all of the tangible material produced from the
> information herein together with all copies or reproductions thereof and
> notify the sender immediately.
> Please also be notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> taking any action based on the contents of this message is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful".
> *****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alcatel-nsp mailing list
> alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/alcatel-nsp/attachments/20100421/b57afcdd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the alcatel-nsp
mailing list