GB> Copied from 12952.4 kc tonite.

Tom Clarke fclarke at EROLS.COM
Wed Jan 27 22:51:31 EST 1999


If all the shore stations have given up monitoring, won't all the ships
junk the capability??  I suspect the owners won't support ($) a system
that is no longer used.  Has just the US given up on the CW capability
or is this world-wide among maritime nations?

curious, de Tom/W4OKW

Steve Harrison wrote:
>
> At 03:59 PM 1/26/99 -0600, you wrote:
> >Jeff/Roberta:
> >I very much like the idea of hams stepping-up to the plate
> >to volunteer time to monitor these freqs.
> [snip]
> >What is the sense of the group about getting the FCC
> >to seriously consider such a proposal?
>
> I like it. I'm hardly able to contribute as I have no LF/HF antenna
> capability; but since I listen to white noise every night for hours on the
> V/UHF freqs for CW, adding 500 kc wouldn't be any stretch.
>
> 73, Steve Ko0U/1
>
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
> To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
> and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname
> To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
> and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS
> Archives for BOATANCHORS: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS
Archives for BOATANCHORS: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --




More information about the Boatanchors mailing list