Your impressions on the HRO-500 please
Cory Hine
hinec at CCGATE.DL.NEC.COM
Mon Mar 1 09:45:23 EST 1999
Bob:
Not having owned one personally, I perhaps was a little less critical.
But what you say, is what I've heard. Thought I wanted one, but now I
know better. Thanks for the response....
Cory/N2AQS
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Your impressions on the HRO-500 please
Author: Bob Peters <soundimp at pobox.com> at smtplink-dl
Date: 3/1/99 7:42 AM
Cory and Group the HRO 500 is a very temperamental radio. The phase
lock loop loves to just drop out for no reason... Band switching is
difficult because of this.... De Oxit is for sure cans and cans
needed... Alignment takes lots of gear and a long time,,, Almost no
one around
that fully understands the radio... I have had two and sold two
will not own another...
My opinion only....
Bob K1JNN/5
At 06:26 AM 3/1/99 , Cory Hine wrote:
> Lane:
>
> I have never personnaly owned one, but I can reveal that I have wanted
> one for years. However, after some of the discussions I have seen,
> there seem to be a few problems with it. Basically, it is like the
> R-390 in that it is very quiet and has really good sensitivity. The
> problem as I understand it, was that it was designed in an emerging
> germanium world, by tube engineers. The signal levels are very low,
> thus all the switching must be perfect. This means a lot of De-Oxit
> and cleaning. Some of them are temperamental, and will work
> sometimes, and sometimes not. I decided to pass on quite a few of
> them that were $500 at the time. It sure did look good at Harvey
> Radio in NYC in 1965 or so though. I just didn't have #3000 at the
> time. Anyway.... do what you will, but be prepared to do some work on
> it before it will operate the way it should. Unless you find one
> brand new in the box!!!!
>
> Have fun,
>
> Cory/N2AQS
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
>_________________________________
>Subject: Your impressions on the HRO-500 please
>Author: Lane Zeitler <zeitler at IBM.NET> at smtplink-dl
>Date: 2/28/99 6:48 PM
>
>
>I am interested in (maybe) picking up a National HRO-500. I know absolutely
>nothing of this radio other than it seems to be one of the neatest receivers
>I have ever seen.
>
>Is the performance really indicative of the high price tags these are
>commanding?
>
>Any better than a 51J-4 or 51S1?
>
>Could use your opinions.
>
>Any known mods that "need" to be done?
>
>Lane Zeitler
>Ku7i
>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname
>To unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS
>Archives for BOATANCHORS: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname
>To unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS
>Archives for BOATANCHORS: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
-------------- next part --------------
<html>
<font size=3>Cory and Group the HRO 500 is
a very temperamental radio. The phase lock
loop loves to just drop out for
no reason... Band switching is difficult
because of this.... De Oxit is for
sure cans and cans needed... Alignment
takes lots of gear and a long
time,,, Almost no one around<br>
that fully understands the radio... I
have had two and sold two will
not own another...<br>
My opinion only....<br>
<br>
Bob K1JNN/5<br>
<br>
At 06:26 AM 3/1/99 , Cory Hine wrote:<br>
> Lane:<br>
><br>
> I have never personnaly owned one, but I can
reveal that I have wanted<br>
> one for years. However, after some of
the discussions I have seen,<br>
> there seem to be a few problems with
it. Basically, it is like the<br>
> R-390 in that it is very quiet and has
really good sensitivity. The<br>
> problem as I understand it, was that it was
designed in an emerging<br>
> germanium world, by tube engineers.
The signal levels are very low,<br>
> thus all the switching must be
perfect. This means a lot of De-Oxit<br>
> and cleaning. Some of them are
temperamental, and will work<br>
> sometimes, and sometimes not. I
decided to pass on quite a few of<br>
> them that were $500 at the time. It
sure did look good at Harvey<br>
> Radio in NYC in 1965 or so though. I
just didn't have #3000 at the<br>
> time. Anyway.... do what you will, but
be prepared to do some work on<br>
> it before it will operate the way it
should. Unless you find one<br>
> brand new in the box!!!!<br>
><br>
> Have fun,<br>
><br>
> Cory/N2AQS<br>
><br>
><br>
>______________________________ Reply Separator <br>
>_________________________________<br>
>Subject: Your impressions on the HRO-500 please<br>
>Author: Lane Zeitler <zeitler at IBM.NET> at
smtplink-dl<br>
>Date: 2/28/99 6:48 PM<br>
><br>
><br>
>I am interested in (maybe) picking up a National HRO-500. I know
absolutely<br>
>nothing of this radio other than it seems to be one of the neatest
receivers<br>
>I have ever seen.<br>
><br>
>Is the performance really indicative of the high price tags these
are<br>
>commanding?<br>
><br>
>Any better than a 51J-4 or 51S1?<br>
><br>
>Could use your opinions.<br>
><br>
>Any known mods that "need" to be done?<br>
><br>
>Lane Zeitler<br>
>Ku7i<br>
><br>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --<br>
>To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov<br>
>and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname<br>
>To unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov<br>
>and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS<br>
>Archives for BOATANCHORS:
<a href="http://www.tempe.gov/archives"
eudora="autourl">http://www.tempe.gov/archives</a><br>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --<br>
><br>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --<br>
>To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov<br>
>and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname<br>
>To unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov<br>
>and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS<br>
>Archives for BOATANCHORS:
<a href="http://www.tempe.gov/archives"
eudora="autourl">http://www.tempe.gov/archives</a><br>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --<br>
</font><br>
</html>
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list