AM Under Attack

[Brian Carling]

On 21 Jun 2003 at 10:42, Colburn wrote:

> > But you said earlier that 5.8kHz was a good idea!
>
> Never once has anyone but you referred to 5.8KHz.  The original
> proposal was 5.6KHz

OK, I stand corrected. The original proposal; which you
initially endorsed without reservation, called  for limiting
all DSB AM amateur radio signals below 28.8 MHz to
a maximum of 5.6 kHz bandwidth.

I must just have a great talent for avoiding all this massive
amount of crap that you are hearing on the air, because
I have not heard ANY of it over the past 5 years
on the air.

This frequency will now be returned to normal amateur radio usage.

73 de AF4K

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html