ARRL Bandwidth Proposal

[Frank Connelly]

Is there some reason this topic has to turn into a snarling cat fight  
on this list?  Is there a lack of other forums where the ARRL haters  
can battle it out with the ARRL lovers?

The "sorry" is lame.  You posted the message  Then in the same E-mail  
you're "sorry."   Give me a break.

I don't care where anybody is on this topic.  It would be nice if you  
took it elsewhere.

73,
Frank, W7ND




On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Brian wrote:

> Then please show us what they did, other than form a
> behind-closed-doors ad hoc committee to ramrod this thing!
>
> On Mon Dec 12 10:39:57 PST 2005, Larry Knapp <kc8jx at YAHOO.COM>
> wrote:
>
>>> I refuse to believe this notion that the A.R.R.L. has "without
>>> having first
> properly consulted with radio amateurs on the matter".
>
> They DID consult - with two people out of the rest that
> were set to benefit financially from promoting WINLINK.
> One or two of the other committee members resigned in disgust
> and for good reasons. If you would read about this instead of
> refusing to see what is going on, you might feel differently.
>
> Sorry for drifitng us off topic.
> I am going back to rearranging the DX100, DX60, SX101 and
> other pleasant radios!
>
> 73 de AF4K
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp? 
> list=BOATANCHORS
> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html