GB> What BA's Use the 2625w Tube?

[Walt Van Arsdale]

With all due respect to the resident grouch...  this is after all a list and
one would think that the primary method of response is to the list.  It
seems most are not able to follow your line of reasoning, judging from the
anemic responses to posts...  particularly those asking for help.  I tire of
chasing down the responses when someone pops up with "Thanks for all the
help!" but nary a response appears on the list.  Also, the archives are
useless, or at least less helpful, as a result.  I can assure you that there
are those of us who relish each new morsel of information!  :)
73

Walt,  K5SXO
devil's advocate

Walt Van Arsdale
Pygmy Wizard Computing
varsdale at verizon.net
903.267.3770

-----Original Message-----
From: Boat Anchor Owners and Collectors List
[mailto:BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV]On Behalf Of Al Parker
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:24 PM
To: BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Subject: Re: GB> What BA's Use the 2625w Tube?


With all due respect to the "Rev. Fr." , that's a lousy way to do it.
Most lists do it the way this list does, and most people like it.  It's
very hard for some of us to remember which (few) lists go to "everyone"
when reply is used, and as a result sometimes personal notes intended for
the sender only get sent to the complete list.  I have argued against the
way you suggest on the 1 or 2 lists I'm on that do it that way.  I'm on 10
or 12 lists in total.  I think more people are able to remember that
"reply to all" means just that & includes the sender, than can remember
that "reply" means "reply to all and not to the sender directly".
73,
Al, W8UT
resident grouch,
apprentice annoyer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rev Fr Mark Gilstrap" <orthodoxhome at COX.NET>
To: <BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] GB> What BA's Use the 2625w Tube?


> Dear Listowner,
>
> You currently have the BOATANCHORS "reply-to" set as:
>
> Reply-to= Sender,Respect
>
> This may be exactly how you want it and this may have been discussed
before.
> If so, please forgive my presumption in the following:
>
> If you set the reply-to parameter to:
>
> Reply-To= List,Ignore
>
> then everybody's replies will, by default, go to the list instead of to
the
> author
>
> You can always still choose to send private replies, but discussions
won't
> stop just because someone doesn't make the effort to specifically
include
> the List address in their Reply.
>
> I bring this up because I didn't see Brad Thompson's note to doc in the
> archives, and would not have ever seen it if doc had not made the extra
> effort to reply to the list.
>
> Mark Gilstrap
> listowner of ORTHODOX at listserv.indiana.edu  since 1989
>

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control -
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html