GB> RM-11306 COMMENTS TALLY!

[john]

At 09:15 AM 2/19/2006, N2EY at aol.com wrote:

>What puzzles me most is that FCC allowed such a short time (30 days) for 
>comments. Either proposal would result in major changes to the rules, yet 
>such a short time was allowed for commentary that I'm quite concerned. I 
>don't recall any recent RM-xxxxx involving amateur radio having such a 
>short time for coments - and these were two related proposals.
>
>Could FCC be telling us something?
>

Yes, but I suspect it's nothing new.

We're (amateur radio) a non-revenue producing pain in the backside that 
they'd rather not have to deal with. They've probably already got their 
minds made up (like usual) and are just going through the public comment 
period as a formality (as usual), even as they already know how they're 
going to rule (as usual).

John K5MO



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 2/17/2006

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html