One Man's Attempt To Save Morse Code

[kd4e]

There are also *questions* about CW - the unique CW "proficiency test"
was (and is) *less* necessary than a test of proficiency with a scope
because 100% of Hams are required to monitor spectral purity 100% of
the time - regardless of mode.

Anyhow, the horse has been beat near to death yet again, probably
we should let it go.  :-)

Oh, BTW: The article title is not even accurate - CW does not
need to be "saved" it is alive and well.  Perhaps he should
tune his dial across a few more bands!  :-)

> Yes Doc, of course. Those kinds of questions are already in the
> question pool too.
> 
>  > So, to be consistent, one must also demonstrate proficiency
>  > in FM for the FM portion of the band - assuring that ones
>  > deviation is correct and the finals are adjusted so as to not
>  > distort ones signal?


-- 

Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html