jfor at QUIK.COM
Sun Feb 3 14:10:32 EST 2008
Generally I agree with your comments. In a recent conversation with a technology museum
curator, the difference between 'conservation' and 'restoration' was pointed out to me.
IMO, conservation is good, restoration is not.
Anyway, after a thorough visual check, I pull the rectifier tubes, and then apply line
power from a power limited source, like a lamp and variac. If that's OK, I apply B+
stepwise with the filaments off and reform the capacitors. Only then do I put in the
rectifier tube and apply AC carefully.
Greg Gore; WA1KBQ wrote:
> It depends on the particular piece of equipment in question. No harm would
> be done at all if a Hallicrafters SX-100-101A or any Collins receiver was
> recapped and it would result in a better working more serviceable unit. On the
> other hand, what about a Hallicrafters SX-10 (200 made) or an RME-9D
> (individually hand built), or National AGSX, Breting 14, Sargent 21MA, or a McMurdo
> Silver 3A? I used to believe every receiver should be recapped until I realized
> important history was being discarded and lost forever when my goal was just
> to put it back on the shelf with a "ready" tag and never to be plugged in
> again. Antiques have more value if left entirely in their original state or with
> a simple replacement filter network that can be easily reversed. The problem
> as I see it with component replacement or re-stuffing work is very seldom do
> you find workmanship that is up to the standards of workmanship of the
> original. Now I realize most of these things were soldered together en-mass by
> women assemblers but they did it every day perhaps thousands of times and the
> quality and appearance of their workmanship is a part of the history; they did a
> better looking job than most of us can do. I now prefer to check an antique
> for signs of life regardless of quality of working order and I consider it a
> plus if any is found.
> For example: I have a completely original Hallicrafters S-1 Special here.
> This was Bill Halligan's first "hallicrafters" communications receiver and
> there is currently only two Specials known to exist. I have established that the
> receiver exhibits a loud hum. This is good enough for me. I could easily make
> it work again but why in the world would anyone want to? The S-1 could
> probably be outperformed by an Ocean Hopper. The historical value of this receiver
> far exceeds any questionable noble intent on my part to "make it work again."
> When checking any unknown antique for the first time I recommend cleaning
> the set first followed by a good visual inspection. Look carefully at all point
> to point wiring and physical appearance of all components. If you see a
> damaged component or a charred resistor you don't proceed with power for example.
> Power the set in steps through a 100 watt light bulb followed by a variac;
> maybe first without the rectifier tube to get an indication of the transformer
> first. The 100 watt bulb will protect the transformer from damage if a fault
> exists. Next I usually plug a substitute solid state rectifier in the
> rectifier socket for additional safety because it allows me to start testing at
> lower input voltage but this is not entirely necessary if you carefully monitor
> the behavior of B+ while advancing the variac. Rectifier tubes begin to
> conduct B+ at around 50 volts on the variac setting and B+ will escalate very
> quickly with any small advancement past that so be careful. I start with some
> measured B+ and monitor how responsive it is to small advances of variac. If the
> filters are in trouble the B+ will be lazy and slow to respond and the cap
> may start to get warm. Good filters will remain cool and allow B+ to build
> quickly to normal levels. Be sure to check component temps periodically too. Of
> course the plate and screen bypass caps will affect this too but we are
> primarily answering the variac question here. There are other means of determining
> if reasonably safe to run with old bypass caps. Usually it is risky to run
> with old caps but I do it here all the time. Just like driving a 1928
> Chevrolet down the highway would be less risky with a modern replacement engine and
> hydraulic brakes but I don't know of any antique car guys who would want to
> experience a 1928 Chevrolet in that manner.
> 73, Greg
> PS- A better method would be to disconnect the filters from the circuit and
> test leakage current first before proceeding with power up.
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
More information about the Boatanchors