Meissner Signal Shifter Coils and Advice
Bob, W5UQ
W5UQ at ATT.NET
Sat Mar 13 09:19:31 EST 2010
I had a Meissner Signal Shifter when I was 14 years old. When I got my
novice license, I used it, coupled into 80 or 40 meter folded dipoles.
Didn't understand 50 ohm to 300 ohm then.
I surmised that I had all of 6 watts... maybe... I worked stations all
over the place and actually got WH6's in Hawaii with it on 40 meters.
Then I got a Heathkit AT1 kit and sold the Meissner.
Fond memories... :-)
Bob Hardie-W5UQ
was WN5EUQ then W5EUQ for a total of 53 years...
Life is like a bowl of chocolates.
Or is it a box of Cherrios?
uh... cherries? Yeah... bowl of cherries...
now I've forgotten my point.
Darn CRS!!! Or is it CDR?
Wilson Lamb wrote:
> Well, I'm well into my "new" Signal Shifter. There was nothing
> "wrong" with it, except for filter caps, which smoked nicely.
> BUT, as usual, there are many questions about old stuff:
>
> COILS- I need ham band coils. I have a source of forms and a great
> turns count (Thanks, Jim!), but would not be ashamed to buy some
> coils, if they show up. Life is short and getting shorter!
>
> COMPONENT VALUES-I have the book, but the tuning and neutralizing cap
> values are not called out. My output tank cap may be falling apart,
> so I'd like to prepare to replace it.
>
> OPERATIONAL CONCERNS-I got 160m going fine, with neutralizing and
> tuning, but, when I tried 40m, the only other full set of coils I have
> (Thanks, Mac!), I have strange results. When I wasn't able to get a
> good SWR with my MFJ tuner, I looked for reasons. When I looked at
> the output waveform (Thanks, Terry), I saw quite a lot of 3.5MHz
> energy, maybe only 3-4dB down from the 7 MHz signal. The 6L6 is
> doubling on this band, but I'm surprised the output tank does not
> reject more of the 3.5 MHz energy. Tuning the output cap does not
> effect the output amplitude or waveshape, as it does very nicely on
> 160m, leading me to think it may be defective/wrong value. I have
> scope pictures of the waveform at the 6L6 plate and the link output
> when feeding a dummy load. Anyone interested can have them via email.
>
> It's odd that the design seems to rely on the same output cap, set to
> the same value, for all bands. One might guess there were fixed caps
> in the coils, but they are not shown on the schematic. All the
> original coils I have have paper labels pasted on top and I don't want
> to disturb them.
>
> QUESTIONS-So, has anyone checked Signal Shifter output
> levels/waveforms on any ham bands?
>
> Has anyone changed the 6L6 stage to fixed bias or made any other
> changes to make the doubling operation more efficient. The original
> circuit uses a combination of grid leak and cathode bias and may not
> be going into true class C operation.
>
> Does anyone have documentation other than the original ops manual? I
> haven't come across a Photofact on the SS, but will keep checking for
> one.
>
> Why am I doing all this? BA fever, of course!
> It's a nicer unit than I thought and easily stable enough for normal
> operation. It keys very nicely and is mechanically robust, with good
> components. The power transformer is big enough to run the Shifter
> AND a 40W final! It's going to make a fine BA VFO and CX rig, but
> really needs its waveform cleaned up for use into an antenna.
>
> I'd pay a few bucks for a true junker worthy of furnishing a tuning
> cap or for original 80/40/20m coils. Otherwise, I'll be doing some
> winding before long.
> Most of all, I'd like to find an original 1938 model Shifter, the one
> in an all black wrinkle case.
>
> OK, OTs, let's have some of that priceless info you are holding onto,
> thanks,
> Wilson
> W4BOH
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subscription control -
> http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
> Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
>
> __________ NOD32 4940 (20100312) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------
Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list