[Boatanchors] Receiver Technology

[Scott Johnson]

Brings up a good point.  I asked if I could take QEX in lieu of QST, ARRL of
course said no.  One can't even wipe one's butt with those glossy pages in
QST!  

Scott W7SVJ

-----Original Message-----
From: boatanchors-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:boatanchors-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of w8au at sssnet.com
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:42 PM
To: richardlo at admin.athabascau.ca; Old Tube Radios
Cc: Old Tube Radios; boatanchors at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Receiver Technology

At 04:03 PM 1/14/2011, Richard Loken wrote:

>I recently read a copy of QST for the first time in a few years.  In it 
>(Jan
>2011 or Feb 2011 maybe?) was a light weight article about the HRO and 
>the demand for change that drove its design.  The article is 
>lightweight to the point of being useless but it has references to 
>articles from the thirties and twenties that might be worth finding.
>
>Come to that, every article in that issue of QST was light weight.  
>Can't anybody read anything longer than two pages anymore?

That's what QEX is for, in this modern era...  Things have changed, and not
for the better, licensee wise....

Perry  w8au


_______________________________________________
Boatanchors mailing list
Boatanchors at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors