[Boatanchors] Receiver Technology
scottjohnson1 at cox.net
Sat Jan 15 16:05:19 EST 2011
Brings up a good point. I asked if I could take QEX in lieu of QST, ARRL of
course said no. One can't even wipe one's butt with those glossy pages in
From: boatanchors-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:boatanchors-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of w8au at sssnet.com
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:42 PM
To: richardlo at admin.athabascau.ca; Old Tube Radios
Cc: Old Tube Radios; boatanchors at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Receiver Technology
At 04:03 PM 1/14/2011, Richard Loken wrote:
>I recently read a copy of QST for the first time in a few years. In it
>2011 or Feb 2011 maybe?) was a light weight article about the HRO and
>the demand for change that drove its design. The article is
>lightweight to the point of being useless but it has references to
>articles from the thirties and twenties that might be worth finding.
>Come to that, every article in that issue of QST was light weight.
>Can't anybody read anything longer than two pages anymore?
That's what QEX is for, in this modern era... Things have changed, and not
for the better, licensee wise....
Boatanchors mailing list
Boatanchors at puck.nether.net
More information about the Boatanchors