<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><p>DSB with reduced carrier is a great mode, a la DX60.<br><br><br><br></p>
<p>Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android</p>
</td></tr></table>            <div id="_origMsg_">
                <div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif:font-size:10pt">
                    <br />
                    <div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
                        <font size="2" face="Tahoma">
                            <hr size="1">
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span>
                            </b>
                            doc@kd4e.com <doc@kd4e.com>;                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold:">To:</span>
                            </b>
                            BoatAnchors <boatanchors@puck.nether.net>;                                                                                                     <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold:">Subject:</span>
                            </b>
                            Re: [Boatanchors] Feb 1964 CQ?                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span>
                            </b>
                            Wed, Feb 16, 2011 6:14:52 PM                            <br>
                            </font>
                            <br>
                            <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
                                <tbody>
                                    <tr>
                                        <td valign="top" style="font:inherit;">Thanks again to my fellow Hams I have a clean copy of the article.<BR><BR>I have been challenged to consider if modern SSB receivers, and<BR>older AM receivers, can handle the signal produced by this circuit.<BR><BR>In theory it can be handled but may seem somewhat "odd".<BR><BR>Someone else questioned if this modulation is permitted, or if<BR>any DSB is permitted.  As best I understand things DSB is AM with<BR>suppressed carrier just as SSB is AM with suppressed carrier and<BR>one sideband suppressed as well.  (Oversimplified.)<BR><BR>Has anyone had any hands-on experience with the DSB generated by<BR>the method described in the Feb. 1964 CQ?<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Thanks! & 73, KD4E<BR>David Colburn <a href="http://kd4e.com" target=_blank >http://kd4e.com</a><BR>SE-GA Tailgate - April 9th, 2011<BR>Have an <a href="http://ultrafidian.com" target=_blank
 >http://ultrafidian.com</a> day<BR>I don't google I SEARCH! <a href="http://ixquick.com" target=_blank >http://ixquick.com</a><BR>Shop Freedom-Friendly <a href="http://kd4e.com/of.html" target=_blank >http://kd4e.com/of.html</a><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Boatanchors mailing list<BR><a ymailto="mailto:Boatanchors@puck.nether.net" href="javascript:return">Boatanchors@puck.nether.net</a><BR><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors" target=_blank >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors</a><BR></td>
                                    </tr>
                                </tbody>
                            </table>
                    </div>
                </div>
            </div>
<br>