[calix-nsp] IPv6 status

Nick Colton ncolton at allophone.net
Tue Sep 14 00:15:14 EDT 2010


While I do agree with you the reality is we all have NDA's in place between our respective companies and Calix.  Why not try posting out on the Calix User Forum boards instead, usually Calix will post files there since it's their forum.

Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Raul Rodriguez <ios.run at gmail.com>
Sender: calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:14:12 
To: <calix-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [calix-nsp] IPv6 status

Absolutely par for the course.

In an age where information disclosure and more importantly, ease of
accessibility leverages market share, anyone else seeing red flags
after being told that they need to speak with a SE for technical
information?

-RR

On 9/13/10, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> Calix has an IPv6 statement/whitepaper that you can ask your SE for.
>
> As Dan already pointed out, going the switch bridge method keeps Calix at
> L2.
>
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Johnson
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:21 PM
> To: calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [calix-nsp] IPv6 status
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> AFAIK... Calix does not support IPv6 on its C7 or F5 platforms. This is
> due to these platforms being L3 aware and having no IPv6 capability.
>
> Is this correct? Any comments?
>
> Brian J.
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:calix-nsp-
>>bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
>>Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:16 PM
>>To: calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: [calix-nsp] IPv6 status
>>
>>Would love to hear what others are doing in regards to rolling out IPv6
> over
>>their Calix networks (FTTH and xDSL).
>>
>>We're doing VLAN per service for VDSL and FTTH and we'll likely turn up
> a
>>/64 on that VLAN to hand out an IPv6 address in that /64 for their
> router or
>>singular PC, and then use DHCP-PD to hand out a /56 if their router
> requests
>>one.
>>
>>For DSL we'll likely do PPPoEv6.
>>
>>Frank
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>calix-nsp mailing list
>>calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp
>
>  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review,
> copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> calix-nsp mailing list
> calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> calix-nsp mailing list
> calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
calix-nsp mailing list
calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp



More information about the calix-nsp mailing list