[cisco-bba] vi <> subiface
mark.walliser at green.ch
Fri Jul 18 10:30:37 EDT 2003
can anyone tell me, what the (dis)advandages between using plain
virtual-interfaces (no virtual-template subinterface) or using subinterfaces
as i understand, using subinterfaces uses less memory and causes less
cpu-impact - so why would one want to use plain vi's instead?
is it also true, that subinterfaces are not pre-clonable? why?
tnx for some comments!
More information about the cisco-bba