[cisco-bba] Ethernet/atm dslam aggregation

[H.Prem Anand]

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:

> Hi Prem,
>
> Thanks for your answers.
> Do both platforms (7600, 10000) support the same features as the 7200?

Yes, both platforms support the same broadband features supported on a 7200

Prem

>
> H.Prem Anand wrote on 29/3/2005 10:31:
>
>> Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>>
>>> I have read that the MWAM enables the 7600 to support up to 32,000 
>>> active simultaneous subscriber (LNS) sessions when equipped with a 
>>> single MWAM. A single 7600 chassis can house up to four MWAMs so 
>>> does this means 32,000 x 4 sessions per chassis?
>>>  
>>>
>> Yes
>>
>>> On the other side Cisco 10000 supports 60,000 PPPoX sessions but 
>>> there is no reference for LNS, only for LAC.
>>>  
>>>
>> 10K supports LNS features also
>>
>>> So, what do you think would be the "best" platform in terms of:
>>>
>>> 1) L2TP termination (LNS)
>>>  
>>>
>> Both 10K and 7600 are good, but I would say 7600 is better
>>
>>> 2) PPPoX termination
>>> 3) PPPoX termination & LAC forwarding
>>>  
>>>
>> For LAC and PTA functionality, 10K is preffered for ATM based DSL 
>> Aggregation and 7600 is preferred for ethernet based aggregation
>>
>> If you have both ethernet and atm, then I would advice you to go up 
>> with 10K
>>
>> Regards
>> Prem
>>
>>> if we use :
>>>
>>> 1) ethernet based dsl aggegation
>>> 2) atm based dsl aggregation
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-bba mailing list
>>> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
    _____   
   (, /   )                   _____ 
    _/__ /                   (, /  |
    /                          /---|                /) 
 ) /     o_    _  ___       ) /    |  _   __  _   _(/  
(_/     /  (__(/_/ / )_    (_/     |_/ )_(_(_/ )_(_(_